NIS2 Directive
Table of Contents
Chapter I – GENERAL PROVISIONS
Chapter II – COORDINATED CYBERSECURITY FRAMEWORKS
Chapter III – COOPERATION AT UNION AND INTERNATIONAL LEVEL
Chapter IV – CYBERSECURITY RISK-MANAGEMENT MEASURES AND REPORTING OBLIGATIONS
Chapter V – JURISDICTION AND REGISTRATION
Chapter VI – INFORMATION SHARING
Chapter VII – SUPERVISION AND ENFORCEMENT
Chapter VIII – DELEGATED AND IMPLEMENTING ACTS
Chapter IX – FINAL PROVISIONS
Recitals (144)
Annexes
Recital 75
(75) Peer reviews should be introduced to help learn from shared experiences, strengthen mutual trust and achieve a high common level of cybersecurity. Peer reviews can lead to valuable insights and recommendations strengthening the overall cybersecurity capabilities, creating another functional path for the sharing of best practices across Member States and contributing to enhance the Member States’ levels of maturity in cybersecurity. Furthermore, peer reviews should take account of the results of similar mechanisms, such as the peer-review system of the CSIRTs network, and should add value and avoid duplication. The implementation of peer reviews should be without prejudice to Union or national law on the protection of confidential or classified information.