NIS2 Directive
Table of Contents
Chapter I – GENERAL PROVISIONS
Chapter II – COORDINATED CYBERSECURITY FRAMEWORKS
Chapter III – COOPERATION AT UNION AND INTERNATIONAL LEVEL
Chapter IV – CYBERSECURITY RISK-MANAGEMENT MEASURES AND REPORTING OBLIGATIONS
Chapter V – JURISDICTION AND REGISTRATION
Chapter VI – INFORMATION SHARING
Chapter VII – SUPERVISION AND ENFORCEMENT
Chapter VIII – DELEGATED AND IMPLEMENTING ACTS
Chapter IX – FINAL PROVISIONS
Recitals (144)
Annexes
Recital 124
(124) In the exercise of ex ante supervision, the competent authorities should be able to decide on the prioritisation of the use of supervisory measures and means at their disposal in a proportionate manner. This entails that the competent authorities can decide on such prioritisation based on supervisory methodologies which should follow a risk-based approach. More specifically, such methodologies could include criteria or benchmarks for the classification of essential entities into risk categories and corresponding supervisory measures and means recommended per risk category, such as the use, frequency or types of on-site inspections, targeted security audits or security scans, the type of information to be requested and the level of detail of that information. Such supervisory methodologies could also be accompanied by work programmes and be assessed and reviewed on a regular basis, including on aspects such as resource allocation and needs. In relation to public administration entities, the supervisory powers should be exercised in line with the national legislative and institutional frameworks.