Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)
Table of Contents
Chapter I – General provisions
Chapter II – ICT risk management
Chapter III – ICT-related incident management, classification and reporting
Chapter IV – Digital operational resilience testing
Chapter V – Managing of ICT third-party risk
Chapter VI – Information-sharing arrangements
Chapter VII – Competent authorities
Chapter VIII – Delegated acts
Chapter IX – Transitional and final provisions
Recitals (106)
Recital 21
(21) In order to maintain full control over ICT risk, financial entities need to have comprehensive capabilities to enable a strong and effective ICT risk management, as well as specific mechanisms and policies for handling all ICT-related incidents and for reporting major ICT-related incidents. Likewise, financial entities should have policies in place for the testing of ICT systems, controls and processes, as well as for managing ICT third-party risk. The digital operational resilience baseline for financial entities should be increased while also allowing for a proportionate application of requirements for certain financial entities, particularly microenterprises, as well as financial entities subject to a simplified ICT risk management framework. To facilitate an efficient supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision that is proportionate and addresses the need to reduce administrative burdens on the competent authorities, the relevant national supervisory arrangements in respect of such financial entities should take into account their size and overall risk profile, and the nature, scale and complexity of their services, activities and operations even when the relevant thresholds established in Article 5 of IORP II Directive (Occupational Pensions) of the European Parliament and of the Council are exceeded. In particular, supervisory activities should focus primarily on the need to address serious risks associated with the ICT risk management of a particular entity. Competent authorities should also maintain a vigilant but proportionate approach in relation to the supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision which, in accordance with Article 31 of IORP II Directive (Occupational Pensions), outsource a significant part of their core business, such as asset management, actuarial calculations, accounting and data management, to service providers.