AI Act
Table of Contents
Chapter I – GENERAL PROVISIONS
Chapter II – PROHIBITED AI PRACTICES
Chapter III – HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS
Chapter IV – TRANSPARENCY OBLIGATIONS FOR PROVIDERS AND DEPLOYERS OF CERTAIN AI SYSTEMS
Chapter V – GENERAL-PURPOSE AI MODELS
Chapter VI – MEASURES IN SUPPORT OF INNOVATION
Chapter VII – GOVERNANCE
Chapter VIII – EU DATABASE FOR HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS
Chapter IX – POST-MARKET MONITORING, INFORMATION SHARING AND MARKET SURVEILLANCE
Chapter X – CODES OF CONDUCT AND GUIDELINES
Chapter XI – DELEGATION OF POWER AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE
Chapter XII – PENALTIES
Chapter XIII – FINAL PROVISIONS
Recitals (180)
Annexes
Recital 42
(42) In line with the presumption of innocence, natural persons in the Union should always be judged on their actual behaviour. Natural persons should never be judged on AI-predicted behaviour based solely on their profiling, personality traits or characteristics, such as nationality, place of birth, place of residence, number of children, level of debt or type of car, without a reasonable suspicion of that person being involved in a criminal activity based on objective verifiable facts and without human assessment thereof. Therefore, risk assessments carried out with regard to natural persons in order to assess the likelihood of their offending or to predict the occurrence of an actual or potential criminal offence based solely on profiling them or on assessing their personality traits and characteristics should be prohibited. In any case, that prohibition does not refer to or touch upon risk analytics that are not based on the profiling of individuals or on the personality traits and characteristics of individuals, such as AI systems using risk analytics to assess the likelihood of financial fraud by undertakings on the basis of suspicious transactions or risk analytic tools to predict the likelihood of the localisation of narcotics or illicit goods by customs authorities, for example on the basis of known trafficking routes.