AI Act
Navigation log
Table of Contents
Chapter I – General provisions
Chapter II – Prohibited AI practices
Chapter III – High-risk AI systems
Chapter IV – Transparency obligations for providers and deployers of certain AI systems
Chapter V – General-purpose AI models
Chapter VI – Measures in support of innovation
Chapter VII – Governance
Chapter VIII – EU database for high-risk AI systems
Chapter IX – Post-market monitoring, information sharing and market surveillance
Chapter X – Codes of conduct and guidelines
Chapter XI – Delegation of power and committee procedure
Chapter XII – Penalties
Chapter XIII – Final provisions
Recitals (180)
Annexes
Recital 163
(163) With a view to complementing the governance systems for general-purpose AI models, the scientific panel should support the monitoring activities of the AI Office and may, in certain cases, provide qualified alerts to the AI Office which trigger follow-ups, such as investigations. This should be the case where the scientific panel has reason to suspect that a general-purpose AI model poses a concrete and identifiable risk at Union level. Furthermore, this should be the case where the scientific panel has reason to suspect that a general-purpose AI model meets the criteria that would lead to a classification as general-purpose AI model with systemic risk. To equip the scientific panel with the information necessary for the performance of those tasks, there should be a mechanism whereby the scientific panel can request the Commission to require documentation or information from a provider.