AI Act
Table of Contents
Chapter I – GENERAL PROVISIONS
Chapter II – PROHIBITED AI PRACTICES
Chapter III – HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS
Chapter IV – TRANSPARENCY OBLIGATIONS FOR PROVIDERS AND DEPLOYERS OF CERTAIN AI SYSTEMS
Chapter V – GENERAL-PURPOSE AI MODELS
Chapter VI – MEASURES IN SUPPORT OF INNOVATION
Chapter VII – GOVERNANCE
Chapter VIII – EU DATABASE FOR HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS
Chapter IX – POST-MARKET MONITORING, INFORMATION SHARING AND MARKET SURVEILLANCE
Chapter X – CODES OF CONDUCT AND GUIDELINES
Chapter XI – DELEGATION OF POWER AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE
Chapter XII – PENALTIES
Chapter XIII – FINAL PROVISIONS
Recitals (180)
Annexes
Recital 161
(161) It is necessary to clarify the responsibilities and competences at Union and national level as regards AI systems that are built on general-purpose AI models. To avoid overlapping competences, where an AI system is based on a general-purpose AI model and the model and system are provided by the same provider, the supervision should take place at Union level through the AI Office, which should have the powers of a market surveillance authority within the meaning of Market Surveillance Regulation for this purpose. In all other cases, national market surveillance authorities remain responsible for the supervision of AI systems. However, for general-purpose AI systems that can be used directly by deployers for at least one purpose that is classified as high-risk, market surveillance authorities should cooperate with the AI Office to carry out evaluations of compliance and inform the Board and other market surveillance authorities accordingly. Furthermore, market surveillance authorities should be able to request assistance from the AI Office where the market surveillance authority is unable to conclude an investigation on a high-risk AI system because of its inability to access certain information related to the general-purpose AI model on which the high-risk AI system is built. In such cases, the procedure regarding mutual assistance in cross-border cases in Chapter VI of Market Surveillance Regulation should apply mutatis mutandis .