Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)
Table of Contents
Chapter I – General provisions
Chapter II – ICT risk management
Chapter III – ICT-related incident management, classification and reporting
Chapter IV – Digital operational resilience testing
Chapter V – Managing of ICT third-party risk
Chapter VI – Information-sharing arrangements
Chapter VII – Competent authorities
Chapter VIII – Delegated acts
Chapter IX – Transitional and final provisions
Recitals (106)
Recital 77
(77) The Oversight Framework should apply only to critical ICT third-party service providers. There should therefore be a designation mechanism to take into account the dimension and nature of the financial sector’s reliance on such ICT third-party service providers. That mechanism should involve a set of quantitative and qualitative criteria to set the criticality parameters as a basis for inclusion in the Oversight Framework. In order to ensure the accuracy of that assessment, and regardless of the corporate structure of the ICT third-party service provider, such criteria should, in the case of a ICT third-party service provider that is part of a wider group, take into consideration the entire ICT third-party service provider’s group structure. On the one hand, critical ICT third-party service providers, which are not automatically designated by virtue of the application of those criteria, should have the possibility to opt in to the Oversight Framework on a voluntary basis, on the other hand, ICT third-party service providers, that are already subject to oversight mechanism frameworks supporting the fulfilment of the tasks of the European System of Central Banks as referred to in Article 127(2) TFEU, should be exempted.